Packaging Tiffany owns a color. Not a logo, not a font, an actual shade of blue, and the courts agreed.
The box is never sold on its own, on purpose. Scarcity is the entire mechanism keeping "Tiffany Blue" worth trademarking in the first place.

Tiffany & Co. registered its exact shade of robin's-egg blue as a trademark in 1998, and Pantone built the company a private, custom color match for it, numbered 1837, after Tiffany's founding year. That number isn't licensed out to anyone else. If you've ever tried to match "Tiffany Blue" for a personal project and gotten a result that was almost right but not quite, that's not bad luck, that's the entire point of owning it.
US law only allows a color to be trademarked once it has "secondary meaning," meaning enough people already associate that exact shade with one company, and only one, that a competitor using it would confuse a buyer. Tiffany cleared that bar because the color had already been doing that specific job for over 150 years by the time the paperwork caught up. The color predates the trademark by more than a century. The trademark exists because the color already won.
The blue started somewhere more specific than "founder liked this color." Tiffany's Blue Book, first published in 1845, used that exact cyan on its cover, one of the first full-color catalogs printed in America, a mail-order jewelry catalog at a time when the format barely existed anywhere. It stayed in print continuously for well over a century, reportedly free to request until 1972, and by the 1990s Tiffany's mail-order catalogs were reportedly reaching around 15 million people a year. Long before any courtroom got involved, that's the whole reason "everyone already knows this color belongs to Tiffany" was even true: a century and a half of the same shade, on the same kind of printed object, landing in an enormous number of American households, generation after generation, without meaningfully changing.
A few years after the Blue Book launched, the jewelry store began packaging its products in boxes of the same robin's-egg blue, and it caught on fast enough that, by some accounts, customers would come in hoping to leave with the box as much as what was inside it. People wanting the container almost as much as the contents predates Instagram by roughly a century and a half.
You can't buy the box. That's not an oversight. That's the whole mechanism.
What keeps the trademark meaningful decade after decade is a much smaller rule than the trademark itself: Tiffany's Blue Box is only ever given out with a purchase. It has never been sold on its own, and the company has held that line without exception. A box anyone could buy off a shelf for five dollars would stop meaning "someone spent real money here" within a season, no matter how good the color trademark looked on paper. The scarcity isn't a marketing flourish sitting on top of the color. It's the mechanism that keeps a court willing to treat the color as property worth defending.
So the real engineering here was never the pigment. Plenty of paint chips match that blue closely enough for casual purposes. It's the specific combination: legal exclusivity, a hard purchase requirement that's never been relaxed even once, and roughly 180 years of uninterrupted, unchanged use, stacked on top of each other, that turns a color into something a company can own and a federal court will enforce.
The Tell Watch for the purchase requirement specifically, on any brand claiming a signature color. A brand color anyone can access for free is just a color, no matter how pretty. A brand color you can only get by buying something is doing real signaling work, because scarcity is the part that makes the signal legible to everyone else who sees it, not just to the person holding the box.
My take The marketing strategy and the legal strategy are, unusually, the same 180-year-old document here. Most brands wish their packaging could pull this off. Almost none have the patience for it.